Anniversary of the Death of Mabus who is NOT the 3rd Antichrist
“Mabus will soon die, after provoking a horrible destruction of men and animals. Then suddenly vengeance will come. Because of endless speeches force will rule; they will know thirst, hunger, when the comet crosses the sky.”
(Century II Q62)
It has now been the one year anniversary for the death of Mabus who we have been proclaiming as Saddam Hussein since 1991, and as my other post points out, we have been saying that “Mabus” is Saddam and NO ONE ELSE. Saddam’s execution/assassination coincided perfectly with the run of Comet McNaught just days after Saddam was killed and even as John Hogue, the acclaimed Nostradamus expert himself testifies to:
” Many of you already know that for 20 years in counting I have declared Saddam Hussein to be my personal choice as the man who would be Nostradamus’ Mabus. In brief, for the uninitiated, the reason being that the law of anagram allows one to reverse in lower case the name “mabus” into “subam.” You can reverse again any letters, such as getting “d” out of “b” and get “sudam.” Phonetics play in the rules. If a similar vowel can be derived, for instance changing “u” to the long, Arabic “a”–sounding like “uhh” or “awh”= (Suh’dam, Sawh’dam) you get “Sadam.” In anagramming, you can add or subtract redundant letters. In this case, add a “d” and you get: “Saddam.”
Saddam Hussein was executed by hanging at dawn of 30 December (Iraqi Time) 2006. Roughly a week later, Comet McNaught passing close to the sun, suddenly and unexpectedly began bursting into a brightness that by the middle of January 2007 competed with the sunset’s afterglow. The comet core and tail rivaled the brightness of the planet Venus. I bear personal witness to its brightness, as I had the opportunity to see it, on 11 January, on a rare clear winter evening in the Pacific Northwest floating above a stand of pine trees. It rivaled the afterglow of sunset behind my house. A few days later it appeared over evening skies of the Southern Hemisphere stretching an arched, hoary rooster comet tail millions of miles into space that drew a line in the sky of comet gas and dust reminiscent of a ghostly ribbon of aurora lights.
The synchronicity of Saddam’s death and the emerging comet engendered an avalanche of letters from all over the world asking if this comet augured Saddam Hussein as “Mabus.” Moreover, did his death and the comet’s transit mean we were about the endure a widening war in the Middle East, if not the onset of the 25 or 27 year conflict of the Third Antichrist in just a few short days or months.
I can say this. Never in over three decades of prophecy watching have I seen a better heavenly portend match the death of a key figure–a prime candidate for the Third Antichrist–as catalyst for the next world war.”
We had written to Mr. Hogue throughout the years hammering on the fact that Mabus is Saddam and no other, but not only this fact, but that the idea of the “Third Antichrist” really has nothing to do with the person of Saddam Hussein as “Mabus”. Everyone gets hung up on the whole “Antichrist” issue seeing the antichrist as a single individual who appears as the antithesis of Jesus Christ.
In our book we are able to identify who the antichrist is without any doubt or speculation. This is because we go by what the bible actually tells us, as it is the bible where we get the phrase “antichrist”. The bible tells us in the 1st Letter of John (the 1st, 2nd & 3rd Letters of John are the only places in the bible that use the phrase “antichrist”) that the antichrist is not a person who is to appear in the future and be the antithesis of Christ, but that the antichrist is MANY people and that they were around at the time the apostle John was writing his Epistles warning the early Christian churches in Asia Minor of the coming of these groups of people who were “Anti-Christ”.
John defines who the antichrist is:
“Children, it is the last hour and as you have heard that antichrist is coming, so NOW many antichrists have come…
Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the
antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son.”
I John 2:18-22
There are many places in our book that explains in very great detail what this means, but for this post I shall address it briefly. The word “Christ” was not Jesus’ last name. It wasn’t Joseph, Mary and Jesus Christ of 628 Bethlehem Lane…the word “Christ” is a title pertaining to the lineage of David the bible proclaims Jesus is from. “Christ” means “anointed” or specifically, “The Anointed Son of David”. For Jesus to be a “Christ” he must be descended from David according to the flesh. (Romans 1:3) Jesus’ mother Mary was a kinswoman of Elizabeth of the tribe of Levi, not of Judah and was not a descendant of David and God is not a descendant of David as God is not a descendant of anyone for that matter. So the only other person in the New Testament that accredits to being a descendant of David other than Jesus is Joseph:
“And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the city of Nazareth, to Judea, to the City of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David.”
Luke 2:4
So the antichrists are those who deny the physical flesh lineage of David. In this case, the antichrists were those who denied (and still deny to this day) that Jesus was born of the physical line of David through his biological father Joseph, but attribute his lineage to that of God Himself! The “Christians” of today say Joseph had nothing to do with the birth of Jesus and that God was the physical father of Jesus. If this is so, than Jesus cannot be the Christ as God is not a descendant of David. The antichrist are they who deny the physical lineage of David and there were many around at the time the apostles were still alive as ancient paganism crept into the early Christian churches and these ones began to deify Jesus as a god, making Jesus another in their pantheon of pagan gods.
Today the antichrist is again identified and in our book we are able to show who Nostradamus sees as the Third Antichrist…or the third “manifestation” of the spirit of antichrist. The antichrist has again appeared according to the Second Coming of Christ and those that stand waiting to again deny this lineage of David and those who come in support of this Divine Plan.
Now that the one year anniversary of the death of Mabus has arrived and the one year anniversary of the comet Mcnaught that was the second brightest comet in over 70 years is this the time that will coincide with the revenge of Saddam? It has just been reported that the year 2007 was the deadliest for the American Troops since the beginning of the war. Will there be another event in the next week or so that will define this one year anniversary of the death of Mabus and the run of the comet as Nostradamus foresaw?


June 29th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
I just don’t get it…How could saddam be the anticrist? Is’nt the second coming of God’s son the one who conquer’s the anticrist…So saying that the anticrist must be someone else, And from what I have read the anticrist is a short stout man with a messed up eye? What’s the truth, What’s not the truth…
Thank’s…
July 2nd, 2008 at 6:54 pm
Samuel,
As is clearly stated in this post, the truth is what is specifically referred to in the bible, as it is the bible where we even get the idea of ‘antichrist’. The bible defines who the antichrist is…as is pointed out at the onset in this post, even the title…Saddam is NOT the antichrist, but the anti christ, John explain in his letters contained in the bible, that the antichrist are MANY people, not just one, and that they started to be around during the times of the apostles, not that the antichrist is in one individual who will appear in the future. According the definition the bible gives, the anitchirst are those who profess to the religion of the false Jesus who is proclaimed to be ‘God’ and at the same time his physical genenalogy from David through his biological father Joseph, is denied. In other words, all Christians of today who say Jesus is the physical son of God, that Jesus is God and that Joseph had nothing to do with the birth of Jesus, are antichirst. The world today is the fulfillment of John’s vision where the world would be overrun and controlled by the antichrist. This is the story today. Over 22,000 sects of Christianity worshipping the false image of a pagan god that they proclaim to be God and denying the phyical fact the bible itself proclaims, which is that Jesus’ physical biological father was Joseph, the husband of Mary. If Joseph was not the physical father of Jesus, then Jesus could not be a descendant of David and thus Not be the Christ…i.e. antichrist. Mary was not a descendant of David and God is not a descendant of anybody, so this neccessary lineage came from the only one the New Testament proclaims to be a son of David other than Jesus and this is Joseph. There are entire chapters in this book devoted to this explanation and the proof and facts that surround it. Thank you for the questions.